Industry Insights

World BioHazTec has been a leader in biosafety and biosecurity since its inception in 1995. Over the years, we have successfully completed numerous groundbreaking projects and received prestigious awards, showcasing our dedication to excellence and innovation.

background decorative image

Celebrating Leadership: Kerstin Haskell Receives the 2025 Diane Fleming Leadership Award

Leadership in the biosafety and biosecurity community is more than a title—it’s a commitment to mentoring, collaboration, and advancing the profession. Each year, ABSA International honors an individual who exemplify these values through the Diane Fleming Leadership Award. In 2025, that honor goes to World BioHazTec’s President: Kerstin Haskell. Why Kerstin? Kerstin embodies the spirit of Diane Fleming through visionary leadership, cross-sector collaboration, and a dedication to strengthening the biosafety profession. As President of the Chesapeake Area Biological Safety Association (ChABSA) from 2024 to 2025, Kerstin reinvigorated the organization—inspiring membership, motivating council, and establishing a sustainable operational model. Her leadership didn’t stop there. Kerstin forged partnerships with organizations previously unengaged with biosafety, demonstrating her ability to translate biosafety’s value to broader audiences. One of her most notable achievements? Securing a gubernatorial proclamation from Maryland Governor Wes Moore, declaring June 4, 2025, as Biosafety Day—a first-of-its-kind recognition at the state level. This milestone required persistent outreach and collaboration with key stakeholders, including the Maryland Department of Commerce, the Maryland Tech Council, and the Universities at Shady Grove. Kerstin’s ability to communicate biosafety’s impact in ways that resonate with decision-makers was instrumental in making this happen. A Leader Who Inspires Kerstin’s leadership style fosters trust, collaboration, and genuine connection. She creates an environment where members feel valued and engaged—bringing not only professionalism but also a sense of fun to meetings. Her approach reflects the core values of ABSA International and the Diane Fleming Award: service, collaboration, and impact. Quote to Remember “Serving on an ABSA International affiliate leadership team is not a burden—it’s an honor. Yes, the work is real, but it is absolutely possible to do this work with joy, humor, and a sense of purpose.” — Kerstin Haskell Acknowledging the Team In her acceptance remarks, Kerstin emphasized that leadership is never the work of one person. She credited the ChABSA Council for their dedication and contributions: Tracey Brown, Treasurer – Integrity and accountability Matt Fischer, Secretary – Clarity and continuity Bruce Donato – Attention to detail for symposium success Ron McNeil – Fresh energy and ideas as a first-year counselor Jamie Pope, David Harbourt, Sharon Altmann – Innovative technical programs and academic partnerships Elizabeth Bramhall, Current President – Dynamic speaker scheduling and networking opportunities Together, they created a culture of learning, laughter, and trust—proving that leadership can be both impactful and joyful. Congratulations, Kerstin! This award is a testament to what servant leadership can accomplish. Kerstin’s achievements inspire all of us to lead with vision, collaboration, and heart.

Read More
Man wearing a suit speaking

The BMBL vs. the NIH DRM: Intent Meets Design

When planning or operating a biocontainment laboratory, two cornerstone documents are frequently referenced: the Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) and the NIH Design Requirements Manual (NIH DRM). While often mentioned together, they serve distinct purposes. The BMBL defines the intent and biosafety principles, while the NIH DRM translates that intent into specific design and construction requirements. Together, they ensure laboratories are both conceptually sound and technically compliant. A Brief History The BMBL was first published in 1984 as a collaborative effort between the CDC and NIH to provide standardized biosafety guidance across U.S. research laboratories. Now in its 6th Edition, the BMBL has become the gold standard reference for biosafety practices worldwide. The NIH DRM, on the other hand, originated as a facility design guide for NIH projects and has since evolved into a detailed, regularly updated manual that sets design and engineering expectations for biomedical research laboratories. While the BMBL grew out of biosafety practice and policy, the DRM emerged from the need to ensure consistency and safety in laboratory infrastructure. The BMBL: Defining Intent The BMBL (now in its 6th Edition) sets out the “what” and “why” of biosafety. It outlines the risk-based principles and operational expectations needed to protect laboratory workers, the community, and the environment. For example, the BMBL states that: Laboratories must maintain negative pressure relative to adjacent spaces. Surfaces should be smooth, impervious, and easy to clean. Engineering controls and safety equipment must be certified and tested annually. These requirements establish goals, but they do not prescribe exact dimensions, tolerances, or engineering solutions. The NIH DRM: Defining Design The NIH DRM, on the other hand, provides the “how.” It offers detailed technical specifications for architects, engineers, and commissioning agents to follow when designing, constructing, or certifying biomedical research facilities. Where the BMBL requires negative pressure, the DRM might specify: The exact pressure differential values (e.g., - 0.05” w.g.). Systems and components parameters performance requirements. What type of engineering controls and monitoring systems must be installed. This level of specificity makes the DRM indispensable in turning biosafety principles into verifiable design criteria. Compliance and NIH Funding It is also important to note that institutions receiving NIH funding for biomedical research facilities are generally required to follow the NIH DRM. For example, organizations awarded construction or renovation grants under the NIH often must demonstrate compliance with DRM requirements as part of their project scope. In these cases, adherence to the DRM is not optional — it is a condition of funding, ensuring that federally supported facilities meet uniform standards for biosafety, containment, and long-term sustainability. Three Examples: BMBL Intent vs. NIH DRM Design Directional Airflow and Pressure Differentials BMBL: Requires negative pressure relative to adjacent areas and directional airflow to prevent contamination spread. NIH DRM: Specifies exact differential pressure setpoints, monitoring devices, alarm requirements, redundancy requirements, and expected systems response during failures conditions. Materials and Finishes BMBL: States that surfaces must be sealed, non-porous, and resistant to chemicals to allow for easy cleaning and decontamination. NIH DRM: Details acceptable materials (e.g., epoxy resin flooring), minimum coving heights, sealant specifications, inspection procedures, and how penetrations should be sealed to maintain integrity. Monitoring, Alarms, and Verification BMBL: Requires laboratories to have visible indicators for directional airflow, alarms for ventilation system failures, and annual certification of HEPA filters. NIH DRM: Defines commissioning requirements to verify if the design intent has been met and containment has not been compromised during commissioning and re-verification cycles. Why Both Are Necessary The BMBL provides the vision and principles: ensuring biosafety practices are risk-based, adaptable, and grounded in scientific intent. The NIH DRM provides the execution details: ensuring that those principles are realized in the built environment through specific engineering and architectural standards. One without the other creates gaps: relying only on the BMBL risks inconsistent design interpretations, while relying only on the DRM risks treating biosafety as a checklist without context. Together, they create a balanced framework that protects people, research, and the environment. Closing Thoughts For private institutions, government, universities, or any organization preparing to open or operate a BSL-3 facility, understanding the interplay between the BMBL and the NIH DRM is essential. The BMBL tells us what must be true and why it matters. The NIH DRM tells us how to build, test, and verify so that intent becomes reality. Aligning both is the key to safe, compliant, and sustainable laboratory operations. For more information or to discuss how these principles apply to your facility, contact World BioHazTec today to schedule a free consultation with our biosafety and biocontainment experts. References Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL), 6th Edition. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institutes of Health. June 2020. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/97733?utm NIH Design Requirements Manual — LIVE Version. Office of Research Facilities. August 2024. https://orf.od.nih.gov/TechnicalResources/Pages/DesignRequirementsManual.aspx

Read More
Two different hands holding ice cream cones

Waffle Cones and Recliners: How the Public Health Campaign Against TB Changed American Culture.

Americans in recent years have become quite familiar with the ways in which infectious disease outbreaks can drastically change our everyday lives. The impact of disease can profoundly impact a community—upending routines and rattling nerves as it spreads from person to person. This is not a new phenomenon in American history. An example of this was the fight against tuberculosis (TB), which not only led to the country's very first public health campaign but also transformed how we engage with certain everyday practices—like eating ice cream. Public Health Education By the late 19th century, German physician Robert Koch had confirmed that tuberculosis was caused by bacteria, but it took time for this discovery to permeate public consciousness. Many people were still unaware of how the disease spread and gave little attention to the behaviors that contributed to disease transmission. It was common for family members, or even strangers, to share a drinking cup, even with those who were sick. No Spitting Up until the late 19th century, spitting in public was considered acceptable social behavior in America, whether it was merely spitting saliva or discarding one's chewing tobacco. With Knopf’s guidance, in the 1890s the New York City Health Department, under the leadership of Dr. Hermann M. Biggs, launched a massive campaign to educate the public and reduce transmission. The “War on Tuberculosis” public health campaign raised awareness about the dangers of shared drinking cups and public spitting. Many states began passing laws banning spitting in public spaces. Instead, the use of special spittoons, which were to be carefully cleaned on a regular basis, was encouraged. With the increased knowledge of the contagious nature of tuberculosis and other diseases at the turn of the century, flyers and newspapers warned Americans against "the filthy habit" of spitting in public. Before long, spitting in public spaces came to be considered crude, and drinking from shared bottles was frowned upon as well. These changes in public behavior helped successfully reduce the spread of TB. The Waffle Cone Ice cream had become popular in 19th-century England. The fad, once accessible only to nobility, made its way to the British general public and then ultimately to America in the form of the “penny lick”. A "penny lick" was a tiny portion of ice cream in a small glass container that vendors sold for only one penny. The glass was usually made with a thick glass base and a shallow depression on top in which the ice cream was placed. Despite this design creating the illusion of a larger portion, it often contained merely just one lick's worth of ice cream. Customers licked the glasses clean, returned them, and the vendor would then rinse the glass container in a bucket of water and reuse it for the next customer. It was hugely popular, and the demand for this inexpensive treat continued to rise. In their rush to serve as many penny licks as possible, most vendors were careless about properly cleaning their glass containers. This resulted in the transmission of contagious diseases like tuberculosis. Penny licks were banned in London in 1898, and while they were never officially prohibited in America, rising awareness of hygiene and disease prevention prompted ice cream vendors to find cleaner alternatives. Italo Marchiony worked as a pushcart vendor in the Manhattan area of New York City selling flavored ices and other frozen treats to customers. He sought an edible solution to the problems associated with penny lick glasses and developed a pastry cup to hold ice cream, which he patented in 1903. In 1904, at the St. Louis World’s Fair, another ice cream vendor, Ernest A. Hamwi, independently developed his own ice cream cone made from a crisp waffle-like pastry. With the decline of the unsanitary glass penny lick containers, this innovation quickly caught on, and by 1924, vendors were producing 245 million cones annually. What started as a sanitary response to a public health issue became a beloved staple in dessert culture. Other impacts on American Culture Shorter Skirts for Women At the turn of the 20th century, women’s fashion typically featured long skirts that reached the ground. However, as knowledge about TB spread, it became clear that long skirts could drag along germ-infested sidewalks, increasing the risk of disease transmission. As a result, women began shortening their hemlines to avoid this potential hazard, marking a subtle but significant shift in fashion. The Decline of Beards In the late 1800s, beards were popular in the US and Europe, both as a symbol of white masculinity, as well as a signal of health. Ironically, many men also sported beards to cosmetically disguise the facial scarring left from previous bouts with smallpox. Before the advent of germ theory, people thought diseases spread through fumes and dust, and beards were believed to serve as a natural filter against illness. As late as 1881, just a year before the tuberculosis bacteria was identified, The St. James’s Magazine claimed that growing a beard was the quickest way to protect oneself from disease. Following Koch’s discovery proving that germs facilitated the spread of tuberculosis, the trend began changing. In the 1890s, nurses had started shaving patients’ beards to bring down their risk of transmitting disease, pointing to studies suggesting that beards could accidentally entrap tuberculosis-laden spittle.  However, there is no factual scientific evidence supporting the idea that beards trap germs. Yet, by the time the flu pandemic struck the US in 1918, beards were declining in popularity with men opting for clean-shaven looks associated with professionalism and youthful vigor. Additionally, the rise of disposable razors made shaving at home more accessible. As a result, showing off a smooth face became the new trend for American males. Hygiene Practices and Public Health Campaigns As tuberculosis awareness grew, public health campaigns emphasized the importance of hygiene. Common practices such as covering your mouth when coughing and using a handkerchief were promoted. Institutions like libraries fumigated books, and banks sterilized coins. Public health posters even advised against kissing children to prevent the spread of disease. Schools embraced the "Modern Health Crusade," encouraging children to wash their hands before meals, brush their teeth, and sleep with their windows open for fresh air. The Sanatorium Influence: Reclining Chairs Sanatoriums frequently used different types of reclining or "cure chairs" to aid in patient treatment. These chairs, often placed on porches, had adjustable backs that allowed patients to tilt them for a comfortable, semi-reclined position while enjoying fresh air. In the early 20th century, wealthier individuals began buying sleek, fashionable versions of these chairs to enjoy the health benefits of sunbathing at home. By the 1950s, these cure chairs had evolved into a symbol of modernist style in furniture design. Credit: https://www.saranaclake.com/story/2016/03/saranac-lake-classic-cure-chair Playgrounds, Public Parks, and Recreation Centers In the 1920s, public health reformers advocated for more outdoor recreation to improve national health. They believed that promoting physical activity in parks and public spaces could help prevent diseases like tuberculosis. As a result, cities began beautifying parks and creating recreational spaces. Additionally, the encouragement of larger recreational spaces played a role in creating more space between buildings and thus reducing overcrowding. In New York, Central Park became known as "The Lungs of the City," reflecting the idea that green spaces could improve both mental and physical health. Impact on Migration and Architecture The fight against tuberculosis also influenced architecture. As doctors recommended fresh air and good ventilation as part of disease prevention, homes began to feature more porches and windows. The idea of escaping crowded, muggy Eastern cities and moving to drier, sunnier climates for better health gained popularity, especially in places like Los Angeles and Colorado Springs. This migration was so significant that, in 1872, about one-third of Colorado’s population had tuberculosis, seeking relief in the dry, healthy air. These public health campaigns against TB led to lasting changes in American culture—from the way we eat ice cream to how we think about hygiene and public health. The ripple effects of these efforts are still with us today, shaping everything from fashion to our public spaces. References American Experience. (2015). The Forgotten Plague: TB’s Surprising Results. Retrieved from                https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/plague-know/ Foss, Katherine A. (2020). How Epidemics of the Past Changed the Way Americans Lived. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-epidemics-past-forced-americans-promote-health-ended-up-improving-life-this-country-180974555/ Graham, Lerone. (2023). The Complete History of The Ice Cream Cone. Retrieved from https://www.thedailymeal.com/1276928/complete-history-ice-cream-cone/ (2024). The Strange History of Ice Cream, From Spreading Tuberculosis To Sweet Summer Dessert. Retrieved from https://www.timesnownews.com/lifestyle/food/news/the-strange-history-of-ice-cream-from-spreading-tuberculosis-to-sweet-summer-dessert-article-109986556 Waters, Michael. (2020). A Brief History of Beards and Pandemics. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/3/30/21195447/beard-pandemic-coronavirus-masks-1918-spanish-flu-tuberculosis

Read More

Top Picks


IACET Accredited Provider logo

World BioHazTec is an Accredited Provider (AP) of the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET). As an IACET Accredited Provider, World BioHazTec offers IACET CEUs for its learning events that comply with the ANSI/IACET Continuing Education and Training Information.

Level Up